mootools 选择器_在MooTools中实现Sizzle选择器引擎

超、凢脫俗 2023-02-22 01:25 26阅读 0赞

mootools 选择器

jQuery creator John Resig released his [Sizzle selector engine][]. MooTools rightfully [opted not to use Sizzle][] for a variety of reasons:

jQuery的创建者John Resig发布了他的[Sizzle选择器引擎][Sizzle selector engine] 。 MooTools出于多种原因正确[选择不使用Sizzle][opted not to use Sizzle] ：

*  Sizzle currently offers [no speed improvements][] over MooTools' current selector engine. *(John Resig commented about this below.)*
    
    与MooTools当前的选择器引擎[相比][no speed improvements] ，Sizzle当前[没有任何速度改进][no speed improvements] 。 *(John Resig在下面对此进行了评论。)*
 *  The MooTools team would have to give up a level of control over its own framework.
    
    MooTools团队必须放弃对其自身框架的控制水平。
 *  Sizzle doesn't follow MooTools' strict coding standards.
    
    Sizzle没有遵循MooTools的严格编码标准。

I agree completely with the Valerio's decision but you may not. Here's how you can implement Sizzle as MooTools' selector engine.

我完全同意Valerio的决定，但您可能不同意。 这是将Sizzle实现为MooTools的选择器引擎的方法。

## MooTools / jQuery JavaScript **(**The MooTools / jQuery JavaScript**)** ##

//just as reader "Ryan" mentioned....
    Window.$$ = function(selector){
    	return new Elements(new Sizzle(selector));
    }

I'll go on record saying that Valerio's post was poetic and 100% on the money: Sizzle is not the answer to a question that hasn't already been answered. MooTools' selector engine is fast and highly extensible.

我会继续记录下来，说Valerio的帖子富有诗意，而且100％都花在钱上：Sizzle并不是尚未得到回答的问题的答案。 MooTools的选择器引擎快速且高度可扩展。

> 翻译自: [https://davidwalsh.name/mootools-sizzle][https_davidwalsh.name_mootools-sizzle]

mootools 选择器

[Sizzle selector engine]: http://github.com/jeresig/sizzle/tree/master
[opted not to use Sizzle]: http://mootools.net/blog/2008/12/04/sizzle/
[no speed improvements]: http://mootools.net/mootools_vs_sizzle/
[https_davidwalsh.name_mootools-sizzle]: https://davidwalsh.name/mootools-sizzle