把幽灵和熔断关闭_比较幽灵和三巨头

淩亂°似流年 2022-12-03 11:27 135阅读 0赞

把幽灵和熔断关闭

[Ghost][] is the latest blogging system to hit the web – as early as August 2013. Its aim is to reduce the complexity of blogging and focus on one thing: publishing.

[Ghost][]是最早于2013年8月发布的最新博客系统。其目的是降低博客的复杂性，并专注于一件事：发布。

WordPress has been the closest platform to this ideal for a long time, but the developer of Ghost, John O’Nolan, decided it was time to go to the next level. John worked as Deputy Head of the WordPress UI Group, so he has first had experience in building these types of platforms.

长期以来，WordPress一直是最接近于此理想的平台，但是Ghost的开发人员John O'Nolan认为是时候进入下一个台阶了。 John曾担任WordPress UI组的副主管，因此他首先拥有构建此类平台的经验。

Matt Mullenweg, Co-Founder of WordPress, is quoted as saying on [O’Nolan’s blog][O_Nolan_s blog], “66% of \[Users\] said they use WordPress as a CMS and not as a blog.” Does that make WordPress less useful for “pure” blogging these days? And what about the other CMS (content management systems) like Joomla and Drupal?

WordPress的联合创始人Matt Mullenweg在[O'Nolan的博客][O_Nolan_s blog]上被引用说：“ \[66％的\[用户\]说他们将WordPress用作CMS，而不是博客。” 这是否使WordPress如今对“纯”博客的用处减少了？ 还有其他的CMS(内容管理系统)，例如Joomla和Drupal？

Over time, each of these has grown to have their own core strengths and weaknesses. Let’s review these and then see how Ghost compares.

随着时间的流逝，它们每个都有自己的核心优势和劣势。 让我们查看这些内容，然后查看Ghost的比较情况。

## WordPress的 **(**WordPress**)** ##

[https://wordpress.org][https_wordpress.org]

Statistically, WordPress is the most successful CMS/blogging platform available. According to [w3techs.com][] WordPress consumes about 56% of the CMS market. That means over half of the websites that use a CMS are using WordPress. What’s even more crazy, is that WordPress at its core is a blogging platform. Since it’s so widely used with such a large community, pretty much anything has become feasible with WordPress. And, it’s easy to do.

据统计，WordPress是最成功的CMS /博客平台。 根据[w3techs.com，][w3techs.com] WordPress占据了CMS市场约56％的份额。 这意味着超过一半的使用CMS的网站都在使用WordPress。 更疯狂的是，WordPress的核心是博客平台。 由于它在如此庞大的社区中得到了广泛的使用，因此使用WordPress几乎可以实现任何事情。 而且，这很容易做到。

### **特征** **(****Features****)** ###

*  Publishing made easy – WordPress puts content ahead of pretty much everything else. Organizing posts and pages is more limited than Joomla or Drupal, and can sometimes be a pain, but when you’ve worked with WordPress for a while the workflow makes sense.
    
    发布变得容易-WordPress使内容几乎领先于其他所有内容。 与Joomla或Drupal相比，组织帖子和页面的局限性更大，有时可能会很麻烦，但是当您使用WordPress一段时间后，工作流才有意义。
 *  Lightweight code – It’s fast because the code is written to keep the core small. This makes it easier for servers to deliver it to your browser.
    
    轻量级代码–之所以快速，是因为编写代码是为了使内核保持较小。 这使服务器更容易将其传送到浏览器。
 *  Commenting system – A unique characteristic of blogs is the ability to comment on posts. Not as surprising anymore, but when WordPress came out, commenting was one of the phenomena that pushed WordPress into overdrive.
    
    评论系统–博客的独特之处在于能够对帖子进行评论。 不再令人惊讶，但是当WordPress出现时，评论是促使WordPress过度运转的现象之一。
 *  Tons of uploadable themes & plugins
    
    大量可上传的主题和插件
 *  Simple to use and flexible to change – It’s extremely easy to develop for WordPress. There is so much documentation, user feedback, and coding experts, that you can always get what you need.
    
    简单易用，更改灵活–为WordPress开发极其容易。 有太多的文档，用户反馈和编码专家，您可以随时获得所需的信息。

### 比较说明 **(**Comparison Notes**)** ###

*  Built for: Bloggers, small-medium websites. Large websites used to steer clear of it but, over time, websites like [MSNBC TV][], [Variety][], and [Getty Images][] have adapted to using it.
    
    适用于：博客，中小型网站。 大型网站过去常常避免使用它，但是随着时间的流逝，像[MSNBC TV][] ， [Variety][]和[Getty Images][]这样的网站已适应使用它。
 *  Usability: Easy
    
    可用性：容易
 *  Scalability: Pretty good. It’s possible to take a small website and make it large with WordPress. You just may need some extra plugins to do it. It also helps to plan well in advance for that.
    
    可扩展性：很好。 可以采用小型网站，并使用WordPress将其扩大。 您可能只需要一些额外的插件即可。 这也有助于提前做好计划。
 *  Extensions: Astounding selection. There are 24,897 plugins for WordPress at the time of this post. Many have become standard downloads for avid WordPress site developers.
    
    扩展：惊人的选择。 在撰写本文时，有24,897个WordPress插件。 对于狂热的WordPress网站开发人员，许多已成为标准下载。
 *  Support: Excellent. You can get the answers to most of your questions in a matter of minutes or hours depending on complexity. In my experience, there’s always an answer.
    
    支持：出色。 根据复杂性，您可以在几分钟或几小时内获得大多数问题的答案。 以我的经验，总会有答案。
 *  Core coding: Lightweight and strong. The core coding is built for simplicity and quick delivery. WordPress has one of the shortest update frequencies of all the major platforms.
    
    核心编码：轻巧坚固。 构建核心编码是为了简化和快速交付。 WordPress具有所有主要平台中更新频率最短的平台之一。
 *  Design: Elegant. WordPress is a designer’s dream. It’s very flexible and easy to develop around. There are thousands of WordPress design professionals.
    
    设计：典雅。 WordPress是设计师的梦想。 它非常灵活，易于开发。 有数千名WordPress设计专业人员。
 *  User administration: Decent. Managing users is okay. You will likely need a plugin or a different platform like Joomla if you have tons of different users for a Social Network for example.
    
    用户管理：体面。 可以管理用户。 例如，如果您有大量不同的社交网络用户，则可能需要插件或其他平台(例如Joomla)。
 *  Community: Excellent. You won’t find a more available community. Lots of people love WordPress, develop plugins and themes for it and contribute ideas to it.
    
    社区：优秀。 您将找不到更多可用的社区。 很多人喜欢WordPress，为它开发插件和主题，并为它贡献思想。
 *  Performance: Great. It’s not perfect, but it’s damned close. Set it up properly and you will have great page load speeds and responsiveness.
    
    性能：很好。 这不是完美的，但是该死的太近了。 正确设置它，您将获得出色的页面加载速度和响应速度。

### WordPress结论 **(**WordPress Conclusion**)** ###

When anyone I know wants to make a website, I assume it will probably be WordPress. I get it. WordPress is easy to use and to get started using. Websites that have 100 visitors a month or 100,000 visitors a month can both use WordPress effectively. It’s well supported, it has become very flexible, it’s easy to publish content, heck, with some frameworks – like Pagelines – it can do just about anything you want.

当我认识的任何人想要建立一个网站时，我都认为它可能是WordPress。 我知道了。 WordPress易于使用并且可以开始使用。 每月有100位访客或每月100,000位访客的网站都可以有效地使用WordPress。 它得到了很好的支持，变得非常灵活，可以轻松地发布内容，并且可以使用某些框架(例如Pagelines)来完成您想要的任何事情。

## Joomla **(**Joomla**)** ##

[http://www.joomla.org][http_www.joomla.org]

Joomla means “all together” or “as a whole” and it lives up to its name. Need a site with lots of functionality and control? Use Joomla. The technically inclined love Joomla because it gives them the tools and features they need to create sites with lots of depth. It’s the second most used CMS on in the CMS market according to the same [CMS survey][w3techs.com] mentioned above.

Joomla的意思是“全部在一起”或“整体上”，并且符合其名称。 需要一个具有很多功能和控制力的网站吗？ 使用Joomla。 技术上偏爱Joomla，因为它为他们提供了创建深度站点所需的工具和功能。 根据上述相同的[CMS调查][w3techs.com] ，它是CMS市场上使用量第二大的CMS。

### 特征 **(**Features**)** ###

*  User Management – permissions and controls for each user is easily customizable. You can make user groups to give sections of users different permissions.
    
    用户管理–可以轻松自定义每个用户的权限和控制。 您可以使用户组为用户部分赋予不同的权限。
 *  Menu Manager – Create a menu for anything and put it anywhere. You can display menus in categories or subcategories, for example. Joomla give its users lots of control over when and where menus are displayed.
    
    菜单管理器–创建任何菜单，并将其放置在任何地方。 例如，您可以按类别或子类别显示菜单。 Joomla为用户提供了控制菜单显示时间和位置的控制权。
 *  Responsive design – In Joomla 3, the UX team at Joomla gave it a massive design overhaul. On top of the responsive built in frontend and backend template, the Joomla package includes Twitter’s bootstrap, Icomoon and LESS CSS.
    
    响应式设计–在Joomla 3中，Joomla的UX团队对其进行了大规模的设计改造。 除了内置的响应式前端和后端模板之外，Joomla软件包还包括Twitter的引导程序，Icomoon和LESS CSS。
 *  Module Management – Modules can display content in any predefined area you want them to. Joomla gives you extensive control over modules and where they can be displayed (WordPress and Ghost don’t have this depth of functionality).
    
    模块管理–模块可以在您希望它们显示的任何预定义区域中显示内容。 Joomla为您提供了对模块以及模块显示位置的广泛控制(WordPress和Ghost没有这种功能深度)。

### 比较说明： **(**Comparison Notes:**)** ###

*  Built for: Small-medium-large websites and some blogging. Extensions like K2 make blogging on Joomla great.
    
    适用于：中小型网站和一些博客。 像K2这样的扩展程序使在Joomla上撰写博客变得非常棒。
 *  Usability: Medium. Making changes and updates in Joomla can be straightforward sometimes and mysterious at others.
    
    可用性：中。 在Joomla中进行更改和更新有时会很简单，而在另一些地方则很神秘。
 *  Scalability: Excellent. Managing sites that grow while using Joomla is very easy. Of course, managing any large site is hard, but Joomla manages it quite well. Sorting through dozens or articles, categories, and menus is very simple.
    
    可扩展性：极好。 使用Joomla来管理不断增长的网站非常容易。 当然，管理任何大型网站都很难，但是Joomla对其进行了很好的管理。 通过数十个或文章，类别和菜单进行排序非常简单。
 *  Extensions: Pretty good selection. There are 6,526 extensions in the Joomla extensions library. There are a couple high profile extensions that many people use like Virtuemart for ecommerce and Jomsocial for social networking.
    
    扩展：不错的选择。 Joomla扩展库中有6,526个扩展。 有许多人使用的引人注目的扩展程序，例如Virtuemart用于电子商务，Jomsocial用于社交网络。
 *  Support: Very Good. The support is not as vast or expansive as WordPress, but there has not been a time when I needed help with something that I couldn’t find the answer to.
    
    支持：很好。 这种支持并不像WordPress那样广泛或广泛，但是从来没有我需要一些无法找到答案的帮助。
 *  Core coding: Flexible and refined. New code like Twitter’s bootstrap has been added while unused code has been stripped out. This gives Joomla more power while trimming the fat.
    
    核心编码：灵活而精致。 添加了新的代码(例如Twitter的引导程序)，同时删除了未使用的代码。 这在修剪脂肪的同时为Joomla提供了更多动力。
 *  Design: Very Good. Joomla by default now supports many design standards like LESS CSS and HTML 5. You can find a  Joomla designer fairly easily although there aren’t as many as there are for WordPress.
    
    设计：很好。 默认情况下，Joomla现在支持许多设计标准，例如LESS CSS和HTML5。您可以轻松地找到Joomla设计器，尽管WordPress的数量并不多。
 *  User Administration: Excellent. This is one of Joomla’s shining achievements. User management within Joomla has always been great because of the tools and permissions.
    
    用户管理：优秀。 这是Joomla的杰出成就之一。 由于工具和权限的原因，Joomla中的用户管理一直以来都很棒。
 *  Community: Excellent. In some ways the Joomla community is more tight-knit than WordPress, it’s just not as widely used.
    
    社区：优秀。 在某些方面，Joomla社区比WordPress更为紧密，只是使用范围不广。
 *  Performance: Very Good. Loading all of the elements can take a while with Joomla if you don’t set it up right. Take the time to get your performance extensions setup and you are good to go.
    
    性能：很好。 如果您没有正确设置Joomla，则加载所有元素可能需要一段时间。 花些时间来设置性能扩展，一切顺利。

### Joomla结论 **(**Joomla Conclusion**)** ###

I manage Joomla sites all day long for work. I can say first hand that Joomla is a great platform. Version 3 has seen a great improvement in usability. I wouldn’t discourage website users from starting a website in Joomla, but I would not tell them it would be easy. There will be times where you stare at the computer screen for hours on end looking for a solution to a small piece of code.

我整天管理Joomla网站，以便上班。 我可以直接说Joomla是一个很棒的平台。 第3版在可用性方面有了很大的改进。 我不会阻止网站用户在Joomla中创建网站，但是我不会告诉他们这很容易。 有时您会凝视计算机屏幕数小时，以寻找一小段代码的解决方案。

## Drupal **(**Drupal**)** ##

[http://drupal.org][http_drupal.org]

Drupal is known for its high level of customization. If WordPress is a race car and Joomla is a Cadillac then Drupal is the Kit car. In other words, Drupal provides you with the strong core code and it’s up to you to put it together.

Drupal以其高度定制化而闻名。 如果WordPress是赛车，而Joomla是凯迪拉克，则Drupal是套件车。 换句话说，Drupal为您提供了强大的核心代码，并且您可以将它们组合在一起。

### 特征 **(**Features**)** ###

*  Configurability – You get tons of control over your content and how it’s displayed.
    
    可配置性–您可以对内容及其显示方式进行大量控制。
 *  Multiple content types – select which way you want to display your content by picking a predefined look and functionality.
    
    多种内容类型–通过选择预定义的外观和功能来选择显示内容的方式。
 *  Flexible taxonomy and menu structure – you can make limitless customizations to fit what ever taxonomy you need.
    
    灵活的分类法和菜单结构–您可以进行无限制的自定义，以适应所需的分类法。
 *  Hundreds of contributed Drupal modules – modules help you shape your site and Drupal would be nothing without the third party content that pieces it together.
    
    数以百计的贡献性Drupal模块–模块可帮助您塑造网站，如果没有第三方内容将其拼凑起来，Drupal将一无所获。

### 比较说明 **(**Comparison Notes**)** ###

*  Built for: Medium-large websites. You certainly can use it for smaller sites, but all the customization will take a lot of time and may not be necessary.
    
    适用于：中型网站。 您当然可以在较小的站点上使用它，但是所有自定义操作将花费大量时间，并且可能没有必要。
 *  Usability: Hard. Drupal doesn’t hold back. If you want to make a website with Drupal you will have to get your hands dirty.
    
    可用性：很难。 Drupal不会退缩。 如果您想使用Drupal建立网站，则必须动手。
 *  Scalability: Excellent. The highly customizable content and taxonomies makes Drupal an excellent choice for loads of complex content.
    
    可扩展性：极好。 高度可定制的内容和分类法使Drupal成为处理复杂内容的绝佳选择。
 *  Extensions: Excellent. Part of the reason to use Drupal is because of its rich third party extensions and modules.
    
    扩展：出色。 使用Drupal的部分原因是由于其丰富的第三方扩展和模块。
 *  Support: Decent. Count on spending a lot of time in development. The support is there but can be flakey or expensive.
    
    支持：体面。 指望在开发上花费大量时间。 那里有支持，但可以是亚麻或昂贵的。
 *  Core coding: Robust. Drupal’s core code is built to last. It’s functional and works seamlessly with new components.
    
    核心编码：健壮。 Drupal的核心代码经久耐用。 它具有功能并且可以与新组件无缝协作。
 *  Design: Pretty good. Drupal has awesome potential, but fails to attract designers because of the complicated architecture. When Drupal is designed well, it looks awesome, but that can be pricey.
    
    设计：很好。 Drupal潜力巨大，但由于架构复杂而无法吸引设计师。 当Drupal设计得很好时，它看起来很棒，但是价格可能很高。
 *  User administration: Excellent. Drupal rivals Joomla when it comes to user management. There are limitless features and options you can add to the user permissions to achieve what you want.
    
    用户管理：优秀。 在用户管理方面，Drupal可以与Joomla竞争。 您可以向用户权限添加无限的功能和选项，以实现所需的功能。
 *  Community: Pretty good. They have a solid base of core users and contributors, but it lacks the expansiveness of a platform like WordPress.
    
    社区：很好。 他们拥有扎实的核心用户和贡献者基础，但是缺乏像WordPress这样的平台的广泛性。
 *  Performance: Excellent. At its core Drupal is fast and efficient. Develop around it correctly and your site will be very fast.
    
    性能：优异。 Drupal的核心是快速高效。 围绕它正确开发，您的站点将非常快。

### Drupal结论 **(**Drupal Conclusion**)** ###

Drupal can be difficult to work with unless you’re an experienced developer. Most sites that use Drupal do so because it offers the flexibility needed to run extremely large sites with lots of functionality.

除非您是经验丰富的开发人员，否则Drupal可能很难使用。 大多数使用Drupal的网站都是这样做的，因为它提供了运行具有许多功能的超大型网站所需的灵活性。

## 鬼 **(**Ghost**)** ##

[http://tryghost.org][http_tryghost.org]

As I mentioned, Ghost has a lot in common with WordPress. They both have the same intent: to create a very straight forward blogging system. Ghost appeals to users by being ultra accessible and easy to use. The following features are some of the new ideas that Ghost brings to the table.

正如我提到的，Ghost与WordPress有很多共同点。 他们都有相同的意图：创建一个非常简单的博客系统。 Ghost具有超强的易用性和易用性，对用户有吸引力。 以下功能是Ghost带来的一些新想法。

### 特征 **(**Features**)** ###

*  Split-screen editing – edit your post on the left, and see the live version on the right. This is one of the coolest ideas, I think. Simply because it’s so easy to see changes.
    
    分屏编辑–在左侧编辑您的帖子，在右侧查看实时版本。 我认为，这是最酷的想法之一。 仅仅是因为很容易看到变化。
 *  All new markdown – no need to know or understand HTML, formatting is done with markdown. This seems a bit unnecessary to me. Why not just have a very basic HTML content editor? Those of use who use HTML regularly will probably find this frustrating and we will be the first to download a plugin that brings in some HTML editor.
    
    所有新的markdown –无需了解或理解HTML，格式化是通过markdown完成的。 对我来说这似乎不必要。 为什么不仅仅拥有一个非常基本HTML内容编辑器？ 那些经常使用HTML的使用人员可能会发现这一点令人沮丧，并且我们将第一个下载带有一些HTML编辑器的插件。
 *  Stats based graphic dashboard – this new dashboard is quite astonishing visually. It looks great! But, it’s completely pointless if you ever need real stats. I like the clock and the date, but the dashboard of my website is not where I go for in-depth analysis. Having a separate tab for this could be interesting, but I’m sticking with Google Analytics, despite the pretty graphics.
    
    基于统计的图形仪表板–这个新的仪表板在视觉上非常惊人。 看起来不错！ 但是，如果您需要真实的统计数据，那将毫无意义。 我喜欢时钟和日期，但网站的仪表板却不适合进行深入分析。 有一个单独的选项卡可能会很有趣，但是尽管图形漂亮，但我仍坚持使用Google Analytics(分析)。

### 比较说明 **(**Comparison Notes**)** ###

*  Built for: Bloggers
    
    专为：Blogger
 *  Usability: Very easy
    
    可用性：非常容易
 *  Scalability: TBD – After reading over what Ghost is made for, it doesn’t sound like expanding or customizing it will be very easy.
    
    可扩展性：待定–阅读Ghost的用途后，听起来并不容易扩展或自定义。
 *  Extensions: TBD – It claims to be just the same as WordPress for development. So it may be safe to assume there will be a good amount of plugins to choose from once the ball gets rolling.
    
    扩展：TBD –它声称与WordPress用于开发相同。 因此，可以安全地假设一旦滚滚而来，将会有大量的插件可供选择。
 *  Support: TBD – There are some big names backing Ghost but support will be based on how many people use it, find issues, and fix them.
    
    支持：TBD –支持Ghost的公司有些知名，但是支持将取决于有多少人使用它，查找问题并加以解决。
 *  Core code: Lean – like WordPress.
    
    核心代码：精益–与WordPress类似。
 *  Design: Excellent. The design is one of the main strengths of this platform.
    
    设计：出色。 设计是该平台的主要优势之一。
 *  User administration: TBD – There is no mention of how multiple users would work with Ghost.
    
    用户管理：待定–没有提及多个用户如何使用Ghost。
 *  Community: TBD – There is no way to know how big the community will be for this.
    
    社区：待定–没有办法知道这个社区的规模。
 *  Performance: TBD – It will probably be pretty fast, but, like most platforms it will depend on how it’s set up.
    
    性能：待定–可能会非常快，但是，像大多数平台一样，它将取决于其设置方式。

### 鬼结论 **(**Ghost Conclusion**)** ###

I’ll have to wait to completely make up my mind. I would like to see how the theme’s and plugins work, what the settings are, how much is left up to plugins to fix, and how much I will miss working in HTML. I am excited at the idea that I can use a platform just to blog. Maybe on a personal site or something. But, at this point, I can’t see myself switching to a brand new platform right off the shelf.

我将不得不等待完全下定决心。 我想看看主题和插件的工作原理，设置是什么，还有多少要修复的插件以及在HTML中我会错过多少。 我可以使用平台撰写博客这一想法让我感到很兴奋。 也许在个人网站上或其他地方。 但是，在这一点上，我看不到自己可以立即使用一个全新的平台。

## 总体结论 **(**Overall Conclusion**)** ##

Well, to be fair, this is an early comparison as far as Ghost goes, bvut it’s still interesting to see how it might fit into the CMS / blogging market already dominated by three such efficient and established content management systems. Still, it’s a market that is still growing and there would seem to be room for a lean, fast blogging-focused online publishing system that is easy for individuals to use. That’s how Ghost is positioning itself. How successful it will be remains to be seen.

好吧，公平地说，就Ghost而言，这是一个早期的比较，但是仍然很有趣的是，看看它如何适合已经由三个这样高效且已建立的内容管理系统主导的CMS /博客市场。 尽管如此，这是一个仍在增长的市场，并且似乎存在着一个易于使用的精益，以博客为中心的精简在线发布系统的空间。 这就是Ghost定位自己的方式。 它将有多成功还有待观察。

> 翻译自: [https://www.sitepoint.com/comparing-ghost-to-the-big-three/][https_www.sitepoint.com_comparing-ghost-to-the-big-three]

把幽灵和熔断关闭

[Ghost]: http://tryghost.org/
[O_Nolan_s blog]: http://john.onolan.org/ghost/
[https_wordpress.org]: https://wordpress.org
[w3techs.com]: http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all
[MSNBC TV]: http://tv.msnbc.com/
[Variety]: http://variety.com/
[Getty Images]: http://blog.gettyimages.com/
[http_www.joomla.org]: http://www.joomla.org
[http_drupal.org]: http://drupal.org
[http_tryghost.org]: http://tryghost.org
[https_www.sitepoint.com_comparing-ghost-to-the-big-three]: https://www.sitepoint.com/comparing-ghost-to-the-big-three/