发布订阅模式（观察者模式）

清疚 2021-12-15 00:27 310阅读 0赞

**设计模式的目的就是使类成为可复用的组件**。

在观察者模式中观察者接口只注重被观察者，而被观察者接口只注重观察者，具体是观察者接口实现类中的哪一个并不在意，而被观察者也是如此。这就提现了可替换性。

A、**利用抽象类和接口从具体类中抽出抽象方法**。

B、**在将实例作为参数传递至类中，或者在类的字段中保存实例时，不使用具体类型，而是使用抽象类型和接口**。

一般我们需要在Observer接口中定义一个update方法（通知方法），然后在被观察者subject中定义Observer的添加addObserver（）、删除removeObserver（）、以及通知方法notifyObserver（）。

下面的是JDK为我们提供的Observer接口：

package java.util;
    
    /**
     * A class can implement the <code>Observer</code> interface when it
     * wants to be informed of changes in observable objects.
     *
     * @author  Chris Warth
     * @see     java.util.Observable
     * @since   JDK1.0
     */
    public interface Observer {
        /**
         * This method is called whenever the observed object is changed. An
         * application calls an <tt>Observable</tt> object's
         * <code>notifyObservers</code> method to have all the object's
         * observers notified of the change.
         *
         * @param   o     the observable object.
         * @param   arg   an argument passed to the <code>notifyObservers</code>
         *                 method.
         */
        void update(Observable o, Object arg);
    }

被观察者代码：

package java.util;
    
    public class Observable {
        private boolean changed = false;
        private Vector<Observer> obs;
    
        public Observable() {
            obs = new Vector<>();
        }
    
        public synchronized void addObserver(Observer o) {
            if (o == null)
                throw new NullPointerException();
            if (!obs.contains(o)) {
                obs.addElement(o);
            }
        }
    
        public synchronized void deleteObserver(Observer o) {
            obs.removeElement(o);
        }
    
     
        public void notifyObservers() {
            notifyObservers(null);
        }
    
        public void notifyObservers(Object arg) {
            
            Object[] arrLocal;
    
            synchronized (this) {
                /* We don't want the Observer doing callbacks into
                 * arbitrary code while holding its own Monitor.
                 * The code where we extract each Observable from
                 * the Vector and store the state of the Observer
                 * needs synchronization, but notifying observers
                 * does not (should not).  The worst result of any
                 * potential race-condition here is that:
                 * 1) a newly-added Observer will miss a
                 *   notification in progress
                 * 2) a recently unregistered Observer will be
                 *   wrongly notified when it doesn't care
                 */
                if (!changed)
                    return;
                arrLocal = obs.toArray();
                clearChanged();
            }
    
            for (int i = arrLocal.length-1; i>=0; i--)
                ((Observer)arrLocal[i]).update(this, arg);
        }
    
        public synchronized void deleteObservers() {
            obs.removeAllElements();
        }
    
        protected synchronized void setChanged() {
            changed = true;
        }
    
        protected synchronized void clearChanged() {
            changed = false;
        }
    
      
        public synchronized boolean hasChanged() {
            return changed;
        }
    
      
        public synchronized int countObservers() {
            return obs.size();
        }
    }